Archive | February, 2012

Alberta Election 2012 — Content curation

26 Feb

Watch for daily curation of content related to the upcoming provincial election in Alberta on my Scoop.it topic.

http://www.scoop.it/t/alberta-election-2012

Here’s a recap, to date:

Feb. 24 - Fires: Critics demand ministers be fired, putting out EMS fires and fiery exchanges in the Legislature. The Friday edition is hot!

Feb. 23 - Power Play: Probing electricity rates, accusations of a whitewash and powerless to prevent a bear kill? (ducking questions in QP today).

Feb. 22 - All Health Breaks Loose: Physicians intimidated, pain medication delayed, no beds for palliative care patients–but report says no need for an inquiry. Today’s roundup of news will scare the bejeebers out of you.

Feb. 21 - Senior moments: Living conditions, long term care fees and Liepert on the road. ;-)

Feb. 20 - Riches and Risk: Richest place on earth, risks in emergency room, oilsands risks debated and doing the right thing. Your long weekend election coverage summary.

Feb. 17, 2012 – Ghosts: Healthcare haunts PCs, left-right is a spectre of the past and who are the mysterious donors behind the WRP’s $2.1M? Spooky.

Feb. 16, 2012 - Blow-ups: Explosive tweets, missing middles and blowing up the voting system. The aftermath of today’s election fireworks are summarized here for you.

Feb. 15, 2012 - Hash: Rehashing wait time targets for the ER, choosing a hashtag for the election and just a mess with chief of staff forced to apologize for bullying. Throwing it all together in one place for you!

Feb. 14, 2012 - Bullying: Boycotting breakfast, legalizing firetraps and undignified burials. A banner day in the news for the government. Curating election news for you daily so that you can find all of the news to piss you off easily in one place.

Feb. 13, 2012 - Falling: Facilities falling into disrepair, small business falling out of love with the Alberta government, Green party rises up from the ashes and falling head over heels for new power lines.

Feb. 10, 2012 - Buying time: Redford budget banks on a boom, Alberta party says the govt stole their idea to consult, Daveberta says the PC message is to remain calm.

Feb. 9, 2012 - The Big Deficit: Redford projects 5th straight deficit, shows a deficit in ideas for the future, while the opposition parties point on the deficit in democracy within the PC party.

Feb. 8, 2012 - The Big Reveal: Redford hints at taxes but won’t reveal, students reveal all as they register to vote, Redford refuses to reveal top-up payments, Wildrose candidate reveals too much and the Alberta Liberal Party reveals its report card on membership involvement in policies.

Starting over: The Descendants doesn’t go deep, doesn’t try to

19 Feb

Father and daughter stalk the coma victim's lover.

Hollywood is nothing if not prescient. Behind-the-scenes strategists have their feelers out constantly tuning in to the changing demographics and the latest trends. Or maybe they’re just reflecting life back as they see it? Whatever you choose to believe, The Descendants is evidence again that the movie industry is on to what Jane Fonda calls the “longevity revolution.”

It turns out this movie is about a wealthy lawyer (George Clooney as Matt King) whose wife is clinging to life in a coma after a boating accident. His family trust is about to sell a huge piece of oceanfront property in Hawaii that has been in the family for generations, and as trustee, Clooney’s character seems ready to join the majority and cash in on this land windfall, retire and resume his cushy life jetting to and fro across the islands. Although dressed in casual floral shirts and sandals throughout the entire film, make no mistake, he’s enrolling his daughters in private schools and generally living a caviar life. Sure, the character is depicted as a bit of a spendthrift, but come on–he’s enjoying a pretty good time in paradise and I don’t think anyone really believes that he is suffering despite his narrated confession: “I don’t want my daughters growing up entitled and spoiled. And I agree with my father – you give your children enough money to do something but not enough to do nothing.”

Life is good, well maybe not

Life is good except for one small hiccup. His wife is in a coma and he’s just learned that she has no hope of recovery. According to her wishes left behind in a “living will,” she wanted to be “unplugged,” and allowed to die without intervention. Well, maybe there is just one other small hiccup. It turns out his wife has been in love with another man and having a torrid affair. Oh, and it seems that his oldest daughter, Alex (played exceptionally well by Shailene Woodley) knew about the affair, hence the rocky relationship between the two of them. Suddenly, Clooney’s character is a lot more interesting and the movie transforms into something else, entirely. Thank goodness, because it started out kind of boring.

The film cashes in on the demographic of the boomers who are now living almost 30 years longer than the previous generation and are pretty “buff” while doing so. I give you Exhibit A: Clooney, who at 50, looks pretty capable of starting a “second life” after his wife’s accident, whereas he may have been considering retirement and golfing with the geriatric set a generation ago. With divorce rates climbing and economic conditions deteriorating, people are looking at starting over in their 50′s, rebuilding with new relationships and second, or even third careers. Of course, I may be a bit biased here, given my personal experience, but I do think the observation is still valid. This a story that could be inspirational for a whole generation of younger boomers, in particular, and perhaps even Generation X’ers who are notoriously cynical but enjoy a bit of fantasy now and again.

Fresh: Woodley is the best

Prepared to be a little jarred by the family dynamics here. If you don’t have teenagers, you might be horrified by the way Woodley’s character interacts with her father and her younger sister (f-bombs dropping everywhere). Having a fairly straightshooting daughter of my own, I thought maybe they had modelled Alex after her and was pretty impressed by this depiction. Confronted with some harsh adult realities at a relatively tender age and left to fend for herself trying to figure it out, Alex puts on a tough veneer for the world. The beauty of this portrayal is that she manages to rage on about “twats” and bosses her father around, while still appearing vulnerable and fresh-faced. Her optimism takes the form of a boyfriend who she “adopts” into the family and who epitomizes both qualities–props to actor Nick Krause as her sweet sidekick, Sid. This woman is going places, both in the movie and as an actress. Expect to see a lot more of her in the future.

So, King is now “victim” as he unravels his wife’s web of infidelity. It turns out that not only is her lover married with two kids of his own, but he also stands to gain financially by the sale of the family property. Clooney’s performance as the devastated land baron is nuanced and deserves the accolades, but I’m not sure this is Oscar-worthy. I found the movie to be pretty glib about the infidelity, as though it was a “no-fault” occurrence. In fact, when King confronts the guy who bedded his wife (in his own bed, it turns out, as Clooney’s character interrogates him for details), he wants to know how it happened. The realtor, Brian Speer, shrugs and says it “just happened.” King responds angrily, “Nothing just happens!” and the response from Speer is, “Everything just happens.” Everyone is off-the-hook here it seems, except when Speers wife, Judy, discovers the affair and shows up at the hospital to confront the comatose woman who, as she says, “tried to steal” her husband. A very strange moment in the film, as King appears embarrassed by her devastation and tries to protect his wife, gathering up the blubbering woman and pushing her out the door.

King of glib

This is the same guy who decides to tell his oldest daughter that her mother is going to be taken off life support while Alex is doing laps in the pool.  Then, he asks a doctor at the hospital to break the news to his youngest daughter. Huh?!! He appears to be emotionally stunted and totally confused, even turning to Alex’s boyfriend for advice. When it turns out that this young man has recently lost his own father in a drinking and driving accident, King’s reaction is to stare blankly back at him, too caught up in his own problems to even reach out. I guess people are often like this in real life, but this is another reason why the ending doesn’t work for me.

At the end of this film, I felt a little hollow, when I think I was supposed to feel a more hopeful. I’m also wondering if the ending of the movie isn’t overly romanticized. The film is written and directed by Alexander Payne who also directed the wonderful “Sideways,” which is one of my favourite movies. He is quoted as saying that he believes there is an audience out there for literate, “slower, more observant, more human films.” I’d be all in favour of that, but let’s not scrimp on insight in the process. There is cause and effect here, life is not completely random.

Then there’s the final scene with King curled up on the couch with his two daughters watching a documentary on TV. It seemed to suggest that everything was going to be alright and everyone would do just fine. A fine message but let’s not turn Clooney’s character into a SNAG (Sensitive New Age Guy). He was no such thing and to end on this note was a little lame.

Alberta Election 2012 — Content curation

17 Feb

Watch for daily curation of content related to the upcoming provincial election in Alberta on my Scoop.it topic.

http://www.scoop.it/t/alberta-election-2012

Here’s a recap, to date:

Feb. 17, 2012 – Ghosts: Healthcare haunts PCs, left-right is a spectre of the past and who are the mysterious donors behind the WRP’s $2.1M? Spooky.

Feb. 16, 2012 - Blow-ups: Explosive tweets, missing middles and blowing up the voting system. The aftermath of today’s election fireworks are summarized here for you.

Feb. 15, 2012 - Hash: Rehashing wait time targets for the ER, choosing a hashtag for the election and just a mess with chief of staff forced to apologize for bullying. Throwing it all together in one place for you!

Feb. 14, 2012 - Bullying: Boycotting breakfast, legalizing firetraps and undignified burials. A banner day in the news for the government. Curating election news for you daily so that you can find all of the news to piss you off easily in one place.

Feb. 13, 2012 - Falling: Facilities falling into disrepair, small business falling out of love with the Alberta government, Green party rises up from the ashes and falling head over heels for new power lines.

Feb. 10, 2012 - Buying time: Redford budget banks on a boom, Alberta party says the govt stole their idea to consult, Daveberta says the PC message is to remain calm.

Feb. 9, 2012 - The Big Deficit: Redford projects 5th straight deficit, shows a deficit in ideas for the future, while the opposition parties point on the deficit in democracy within the PC party.

Feb. 8, 2012 - The Big Reveal: Redford hints at taxes but won’t reveal, students reveal all as they register to vote, Redford refuses to reveal top-up payments, Wildrose candidate reveals too much and the Alberta Liberal Party reveals its report card on membership involvement in policies.

 

 

Houston inspired a generation — and still does

12 Feb

We’ve seen our share of celebrity deaths recently. The death of Amy Winehouse hit me pretty hard, I was a fan and I wrote about it here on my blog. But after hearing about Whitney Houston, I suddenly feel like I’ve been hit by a truck.

It’s not that I was a particularly big follower of Houston, so I’m struggling to explain it. Sure, I loved her voice, but I don’t have any of her music on my iTunes playlist and would have never listed her one of my favourite performers… And that makes me pretty sad.

As the tributes began pouring in, I realized suddenly how many people she inspired (including some of my other favourite artists) and how she had tried to help so many others move forward in their careers, even though she was clearly struggling in her personal and professional life.

I also began reflecting on how her music really was the backdrop to my own life, like a movie soundtrack that is so subtle, yet, so in tune with the storyline.

Generation X was an intersection of two worlds

She was close to my own age and grew up in an era that many might find hard to understand now. Technology did not play a significant role–schools had no computers, or even calculators (which were not allowed). Gender roles were in flux. Teenaged-girls were bombarded with conflicting ideas about what it meant to be a woman. From the “free love,” Pill-induced sexual frenzy of the 70′s to the more traditional parental encouragement of restraint, chastity and marriage to a “nice boy,” it was difficult to figure out what was expected of you and what success should look like.

Houston’s music had that juxtaposition of sweet vulnerability, tempered with the stubborn realism that was such a part of my generation. Even today, I find myself and others of my age to be very cautious about the future, although deep-down wishing to experience that wild enthusiasm we witnessed in the boomers who went before us. We’re a little jealous that we were robbed of that ability to just let go and be unrestrained in everything (we grew up with the spectre of AIDS, after all).

In 1963, the year Houston was born, the assassination of John F. Kennedy represented a turning point. Here in Canada, we had the FLQ crisis unfolding with bombings and the spectre of political turmoil. The heady ideas of a brighter tomorrow were dealt some pretty harsh blows during these years.  In 1968, when Houston was just starting elementary school, Martin Luther King Jr. was also assassinated. There was an ominous feeling that change, once thought to be imminent, was going to be a lot harder than anyone imagined. Born in the shadow of the baby boomers, we Generation X’ers represented a new pragmatism. We’ve always had a certain caution about the future, knowing the bulge of the generation before us was going to forever determine our own future prospects.

She blew us away

Houston’s music was always epic (with a voice like that, how could it not be?) and even in her mid-20′s she literally blew onto the music scene like a hurricane with her anthems of courage and overcoming challenges — “No matter what they take from me …They can’t take away my dignity” (Greatest Love of All). It’s as if her early songs, filled with an attitude of hopeful innocence, unvarnished optimism and genuine romanticism, were designed to bolster the sagging spirits of an entire generation. I believe she did her best to lift we Generation X’ers up and give us some hope that things were going to get better.

Then, she met Bobby Brown. Now, I’ve got nothing against the guy, but I have a feeling that he wasn’t all that good for Houston. Just a hunch.

Nonetheless, she married him in 1992, their daughter was born in 1993 and they stayed together for 15 years. The 90′s were certainly tumultuous times and Houston’s music seemed to become much less hopeful. There was: “I Have Nothing,” “Why Does it Hurt so Bad?” “It’s Not Right, But It’s Okay,” and “Fine.” Those are just a few samples of her songs from the years post-Brown. Of course, I’m being unfair and who knows what the reasons were for this artistic swing in her music towards themes of loss, pain and compromise?

Despair does damage

In “Run to You,” she sings, “there’s no one there, no one cares for me” and the lyrics are so incredibly tragic. The despair and disappointment in this song are so palpable that it makes me tear up.

When I think about Houston, dying alone in her hotel room at almost my exact age, I’m left with a renewed determination to not let my own life’s setbacks (I’ve had a few lately) get the best of me. Houston is continuing to inspire and motivate this Gen-X’er, even if, sadly, it is by her death. In the words of one of her most recent hit singles:

I look to you
I look to you
After all my strength is gone
In you I can be strong

Back in the day: Old marketing brochure for Carleton features Fort McMurray newspaper

10 Feb

The Fort McMurray EXPRESS was a weekly newspaper in the northern Alberta town in the early 70′s, 80′s and early 90′s. The newspaper’s publisher, Irwin Huberman was an early mentor of mine and a Carleton graduate, which is why I think the Carleton University School of Journalism featured the newspaper on its cover. This is the promotional brochure from the early 80′s that influenced me to apply for admission!

An old game’s revival: Winning and losing your marbles (From June 11, 1986 issue of the Fort McMurray Express newspaper)

10 Feb

Kellie Gauthier (center) and "marble buddies" show off their collections of "plainies," "boulders," "galaxies" and "steelies."

From the archives: One of the first feature articles I ever wrote while working for the weekly newspaper in Fort McMurray, called the Fort McMurray Express.

*******************************************************************

How the circle goes round and round?

In recent years, young consumers have been bombarded by a barrage of high tech toys, computers, designer dolls, war games and robots.

But there’s a “new” game capturing the school yard attention of students throughout the city. To those of older years, it involves a traditional game with a few new wrinkles.

Yes, the age-old game of marbles is back in town — with a passion.

EXPRESS staff writer Jody MacPherson spent Monday lunch at the Good Shepherd schoolyard, learning the vital differences between a steelie, creamie and other characters of the marble trade.

Stories by Jody MacPherson, Staff Writer

The schoolyard is a different world at recess.

It’s a world where marbles are traded and cherished, where a strange language is spoken and where the games are played in the “marble fields.”

At Good Shepherd Community School, kids of all ages clutch their marbles in plastic bags and ice cream containers. They venture out into the schoolyard to play games like “hitsies” and “potsies.”

“You have to hide them when you’re in class,” says Kellie Gauthier, 10, “or the teachers will take them away from you.”

Gauthier says he has 2,605 marbles and that he and his brother are “marble buddies.” Between the two, Gauthier says they have about 8,000 marbles.

He says everyone plays marbles, both the girls and the boys.

“The girls cheat you sometimes,” he adds.

Gauthier says he once had two of his prize marbles stolen by a girl but he had no way of proving it. He says he thought he might have to use tape to mark his marbles, but decided not to.

Marbles usually change hands quickly in the schoolyard. There are a dozen different games and they all involve risking your marbles to win someone else’s.

In “hitsies,” the object is to try and hit a marble resting on the ground with your marble. If you hit it, you win both marbles, but if you miss it, you lose both.

In “potsies,” participants try to be the last marble in the “pot,” a shallow hole in the ground.

There are names for each type of shot and different variations on the games. Everyone in the schoolyard understands the jargon of marbles and they speak it fluently.

Each type of marble has a different name and some are more valuable than others. “Galaxies” and “crown jewels” are the two most valuable marbles.

The marbles are bought in toy stores and some, like “steelies” are ordinary ball bearings obtained from their parents.

Occasionally, someone will get tired of their marbles and yell, “scramble.” The marbles are then thrown into the air and other kids rush to recover them.

In the world of marbles, collections are won and lost very quickly.

When the bell sounds to end recess, the marbles are safely stowed in desks and lunch kits and it’s back to work.

MARBLESPEAK: Talking like the pro’s do

Marbletalk is easy to learn. All you have to do in most cases is add “sie” on the end of normal English and soon you’ll be conversing with the most avid marble collector.

For quick reference, here’s a list and an interpretation of the most common terms in marbletalk.

Hitsies: a marble game where one person tries to hit the other’s marble from a standing position.

Potsies: the object is to be the last marble in a shallow hole in the ground called a “pot.”

Trysies: this is an attempt at a shot, but you do not get to keep the marble if you hit it, similar to a practice shot.

Flicksies: this is a type of shot which involves a tricky flick of the wrist (there are different variations, for example, the Dutch or Newfie flic, although no one knows why they’re called this).

Cheatsies: this is highly frowned upon.

Clearsies: this procedure involves strategic sweeping of the ground around a pot or a marble to clear a path.

Exchangies: this illegal practice involves switching a marble on a person when they won it legitimately.

Blocksies: when a stray rock or bug runs interference, this call can entitle the shooter to another shot.

Lifties: a type of shot which involves lobbing the marble.

Rabbit ears: this is achieved when a person stands with both feet together and pointing outwards in order to provide a rebound into the pot.

Snap, crackle, pop: this is a shot which involves three attempts to get a marble in.

Eyedrops or bombs: a shot taken from directly above and dropped on the marble.

Jumbos: the largest type of marble, quite popular.

Boulders: the second largest marble, about the size of a bubblegum jawbreaker.

Plainies: the ordinary size marbles, which are also the most common.

Creamies: milky colored swirled marbles.

Peewees: the smalled marbles, these are definitely hard to find in a scramble.

Galaxies: one of the most valuable marbles, these are speckled with different colors.

Oilies: the surface of this marble is slick like an oil spill and a rainbow of colors is evident.

Skunks: these rare marbles are black with a white stripe.

Ghosties: a solid white marble.

Bloody Mary: a solid red marble.

Crystal: a clear marble which is often tinted different colors.

Crown Jewels: one of the most valuable marbles, this one resembles a gem, sor of a combination between a crystal and an oilie.

Spiders: clear except for four colored stripes, all the same colour, in the center of the marble.

Cagies: same as a spider except with five stripes.

Pinwheel: usually black with coloured stripes.

Freedom of the press still worth defending, even in small town Alberta

7 Feb

I may be naive but I still believe that freedom of the press is not only possible, but worthy of defending.

That’s why I’ve commented on Facebook and Twitter about the fact that the nominated candidate for the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta in the riding of Highwood (John Barlow) has NOT yet stepped down from his job of Associate Publisher of the Okotoks Western Wheel newspaper. The newspaper is THE major newspaper in the riding with a circulation of  13,250–the only newspaper in the town of Okotoks. Barlow has stated that he will step down, but not until the writ is dropped (the last 30 days of the campaign). Until that time, he will remain in a decision-making capacity at the newspaper.

When I speculated on Twitter about the impartiality of the Western Wheel newspaper as it covers the weeks leading up to the official campaign period, Barlow tweeted the following response (using his personal campaign moniker of @Barlow4Highwood):

I assure you it will not change. The Wheel prides itself on being fair and that will continue. (See the original tweet)

When asked on Twitter if he was tweeting on behalf of the Wheel via his campaign account, he didn’t respond directly, tweeting enigmatically instead:

The Wheel has a great reputation and it speaks for itself. (See the original tweet)

For those who are unaware of the important role of the media in the effective functioning of a democratic society, the Canadian Newspaper Association has stated it thus:

Freedom of the press is an exercise of every Canadian’s right to freedom of expression guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is the right to gather and disseminate information, to discuss, to advocate, to dissent. A free press is essential to our democratic society. It enables readers to use their Charter right to receive information and make informed judgements on the issues and ideas of the time. (Source: Canadian Newspaper Association’s Statement of Principles)

This is not about John Barlow as an individual (he’s a very likeable fellow, by all accounts) or the Western Wheel newspaper in particular (although I’ve taken exception to some of their news coverage in the past), it’s about the Charter rights of the citizens in the riding of Highwood and how they make an informed decision on voting day. They are entitled to an objective source of news, information about their community’s issues and concerns and unbiased coverage of the election in the days leading up to the official dropping of the writ.

Barlow is in a leadership capacity at the town’s only newspaper, while also representing one of the political parties on the ballot of the next election. This raises a conflict of interest question, leaving the community lacking an assured, reliable, and unbiased newspaper to find out what they need to know to make a decision about who to vote for.

The fact that he is representing the party that has been in power for 40 years makes it even more disturbing. Some have countered by claiming that his main opponent in the upcoming election, Danielle Smith, has her own connections (0r at least her party does) in the media. My argument here is that media bias is bad, no matter where it exists.

I’m not going to try and unravel Smith’s media connections (feel free to submit your comments about this but please be prepared to back up with your sources and I’ll consider posting them). All I’ll say is that the voters in Highwood should be even more enraged by the apparent lack of impartial information available to them. (Full disclosure: I am a member of the Alberta Liberal Party and a former resident of the riding. However, at the time of this post there was no ALP candidate nominated in the riding).

So what is the big deal, really?

The Canadian Association of Journalists examined the ethical issues of journalists seeking public office thoroughly in a paper delivered in October of 2010. Their conclusion:

There is irony in all of this careful consideration of political disengagement in that some media organizations and their owners publicly engage in direct and indirect political activity on a regular basis without apparent consideration or concern about it reflecting poorly or otherwise on their organization, its product or its employees.

However, as chroniclers of history who help citizens make well-informed choices, working journalists bear the burden of a higher public expectation that they submit personal bias and political view to the demands and disciplines of their work. And, perhaps that is exactly as it should be. A range of independent, unencumbered and trustworthy media is a valued asset in any democratic society.

If journalists accept that the “objective method” contributes to the public trust, and that “impartiality” is not just a noble ambition but a relevant goal to honour our democratic responsibility, then it is important to strive to preserve the integrity of the ideal – even if it may sometimes mean voluntarily surrendering some personal freedoms.

The paper states that:

The real question becomes: if and when they do exercise their fundamental political rights, do journalists have special responsibilities as journalists to their employers, peers, or the public? The short answer seems to be: “yes.”

Much of what a journalist does is report on, chronicle or comment upon the activities and behaviours of others, including on occasion, the political activities and integrity of individuals, governments or organizations. The journalist’s works are by definition public and therefore can directly or indirectly influence other people and society’s perception of his/her subject.

If a journalist engages in outside political activity or espouses a particular political viewpoint, this activity could create a public perception of bias, or favouritism that would reflect on the journalist’s work as well as on the media organization for which he or she may work. As a result, many media organizations have policies to govern a journalist’s engagement in outside political activity.

Fortunately, there are now many alternative news sources online and other media outlets in nearby Calgary, but this does not change the fact that the local newspaper gives the appearance that it is on side with the current government. The paper’s credibility and brand is now under suspicion. Citizens in Okotoks may feel they have no truly independent LOCAL newspaper to turn to for coverage of the election and beyond.

This is why I believe PC candidate John Barlow should step down immediately (not wait until the writ is dropped), until after the election. To do otherwise is a clear rejection of his own profession’s standards of ethics, is damaging to the reputation of his employer (whether the Western Wheel understands this or not) and does a disservice to the democratic Charter rights of the people in his community.

As Reporters Without Borders states emphatically on its website:

“Don’t wait to be deprived of news to stand up and fight for it”

Further reading:

The Twitter exchange in full here.

Film review: Consider Coriolanus from the comfort of your couch

3 Feb

Coriolanus is confronted by his mother, wife and son.

The new film adaptation of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, directed by Ralph Fiennes, offers up a jolt of modern day movie testosterone, while staying true to the original, brilliant play written in the early 17th century.

With all of the dialogue spoken in Shakespearean English, but the setting so completely in the here and now, you’d think it would take a lot more getting used to than it actually does. (Declaration of bias here: I love Shakespeare and may not be in the majority of movie-goers, judging by the number of people who walked out in the first half of the film screening I attended).

The movie opens with food riots in Rome, where rioters clash with police as trucks are delivering goods to the rich and powerful (the 1%?) while the citizenry goes hungry (the 99%?). This is where we are first introduced to Caius Martius Coriolanus (Fiennes at his scariest, which is saying a lot, given his past roles). He emerges from the line of police officers, shields raised against the mob, looking scarred and ominous. I kept waiting for him to whip out a can of pepper spray! With those piercing eyes so vacuous and vicious, he derides the “curs” for even daring to suggest they deserve food, given that he and others of his ilk have so courageously been defending Rome in battle and otherwise.

Go get you home, you fragments (Coriolanus to the crowd, spittle flying out of his mouth to great effect)

This is not a man who cares much about personal popularity and as we are next shown, his bloodthirsty desire to conquer his enemies in battle is his great obsession. Well, maybe his second greatest obsession, his first being to please his mother (played by Vanessa Redgrave with such vigour and derangement that it might give you nightmares). Yes, there are some extremely uncomfortable Oedipal scenes suggesting an unhealthy relationship between mother and son.  Even Coriolanus’ wife feels like she has to back out of the room when encountering the two of them together, mom tenderly bandaging his wounds. Wife Virgilia (played by the lovely Jessica Chastain) retreats to tend to their small son perhaps feeling just a little left out of the equation. Creepy.

Speaking the language

As the story moves into the battle scenes, the historical language seems less of a barrier, given the timeless nature of war. Not much has changed in that regard–the same killing and maiming whether in the 17th century or the 21st. The importance of leadership when going into battle and the clearly demented nature of Coriolanus’ love of fighting are punctuated here with lots of bloodletting, gun play and explosions to satisfy our love of special effects.

On a side note, I found the use of the hand-held camera during much of the film to be a bit nauseating and distracting. The battle scenes and subsequent crowd scenes often switch to hand-held. A little less of this would have been just as effective and a lot less dizzying.

Bromance or Brokeback Mountain?

It is during the battle scene that we are introduced to Tullus Aufidius (Gerard Butler **dreamy sigh**), Coriolanus’ mortal enemy. Personally, I think there is a somewhat homoerotic subtext to the relationship between the two men as depicted in this film. But then again, my friends suggested to me that it is more an innocent bromance rather than an all-out Brokeback Mountain-thing. Nevertheless, (SPOILER ALERT) there’s no doubt in my mind that as the two mortal enemies join forces later, which leads to the ultimate betrayal by Aufidius, the final scene is the most lovingly delivered stabbing I’ve ever seen. Butler gives a strong performance as Aufidius and forgive me a little swooning but that guy could make you want to be stabbed (tsk, tsk, get  your minds out of the gutter).

My favourite scene in the entire movie is when Coriolanus appears in a live television studio session (some sort of open mic session) where he needs to win over the audience in order to be appointed to a government leadership role. He already has the endorsement of the elite, but he now needs to placate the crowd in order to avoid “banishment from Rome” (the adaptation to modern times is a little weak here). He’s already been prepped by his mother to not reveal his true feelings, but to win them over with words–true or not. Alas, it is not in his nature to lie as he is a man of impulse and emotion. As the crowd chants and challenges him, he loses his cool, reveals his true contempt for “the people” and walks out, not only on the audience, but on his family and his beloved Rome.

With the many months of live Republican presidential debates, many of them stacked with supporters sometimes jeering and shouting, this scene resonated with me. It seems like our political discourse has not changed much over the centuries. Shakespearean language or not, he captures the mood of today’s televised political debates almost perfectly with this scene.

Populism is fickle

As I mentioned earlier, this film is not for everyone, judging by the number of people fleeing the theatre at the screening I attended. It has been critically acclaimed so far, but the reaction from audiences has been a little less enthusiastic (although the Rotten Tomatoes audience rating is over 60% favourable). The monologues require an intense concentration and there are a lot of extreme close-ups, somewhat exaggerated characterizations and abrupt changes in allegiance that might be a little confounding (and yet, it does speak to the fickle nature of populism).

Political junkies will enjoy this movie, I think and, of course, Shakespeare buffs. Given the fast-moving and unsteady camera work (some might find it overly distracting) it might be a little less jarring at home on the television screen. In the comfort of your own home you could also pause and rewind when necessary if the language becomes difficult to follow (or just to appreciate the richness of the verse!).

I know that it may seem trite to suggest that everyone should be exposed to a little of the Bard’s insight but this comment by Robert Graves really sums it up for me: “The remarkable thing about Shakespeare is that he is really very good – in spite of all the people who say he is very good.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.